Tuesday, October 07, 2008

But whose fault was it?

I heard Max Mosley on the radio tonight saying that it would take his family years to get over the exposure in the paper of his sordid little sex games. And what right did a newspaper have to destroy a family like that?

Um, was it the exposure that destroyed the family? Or was it his actions?

I'm not condoning the newspaper just thinking that, perhaps, he should be less, um, self-righteous.


Further on up the road said...

I do think that frankly I'm not sure it was "in the public interest" to be exposed etc. I'm a huge motor racing fan and I don't care but think he should go just simply due to the farcical inconsistency of decisions I see week in week out at major races. I don't care about the other stuff I just don't think he does a good job.

However as you say Liz if he choses to live that life he needs to deal with the consequences.

"Don't gamble with that you can't afford to lose" was a recent quote someone gave me and it's a good think to consider.

Liz said...

I have no idea about what sort of manager he was and whether he should have resigned. I also think some of the justification the press give for their actions is laughable. AS you say, why on earth would it be in the public interest?

I do like that quote you quoted.

Dragonstar said...

If he'd done nothing, and then the press did whatever they do, he'd be right to complain.
Yes, that's a good quote.

Ole Phat Stu said...

Now if ithe had been his dad, I'd have said he was getting shirty ;-)

Anonymous said...

puma mens shoes
puma shoes
puma speed
nike shoes
nike air
nike air shoes
nike air max 90
nike air max 95
nike air max tn
nike air rift
nike shox r4
nike air max 360
nike shox nz
puma cat
air max trainers
mens nike air max
sports shoes
nike air rifts
nike air rift trainer
nike air
nike shoes air max
nike shoes shox
air shoes
Lucyliu IS Lucyliu
nike shoe cart
puma future
cheap puma
nike rift
jeans shop
diesel jeans
levis jeans
nike rift shoes
cheap nike air rifts
bape shoes